Formulation/Process problems with flex clears and cling

compounding's many aspects

Formulation/Process problems with flex clears and cling

Postby GavinS on Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:42 pm

Hi to all,
First and foremost i would like to really express my gratitude and appreciation for this site/forum. The information that can be found here with regards to chemical science, mechanical know how, and especially hard won battles resulting in experience are a real treasure chest. During the last few days i have read many posts and replys, and the assistance given is truly unselfish and exceptional. A couple of the real stand out guys - please forgive me if i dont mention your name - Skip, Len, Louis, DwightDixon, you guys are awesome! I can only hope that one day I can know a fraction of what you guys have forgotten, and am modest enough to pass it on.

Ok now to the problem at hand... Let me first give you guys some background info - We are a smallish compounder based in South Africa, with the vast majority of our products being utilized in the cable and moulding industries. To date our products have done well in the market and fulfill our customers requirements (putting it this way cos i have come to realize we could improve here and there :oops: )
Recently we have had enquiries to compound amongst others a clear flex grade for curtain material, and a clear flex grade for cling wrap. Sounds easy enough but we just dont seem to be able to manufacture either of them to be able to meet the required standards. Problems with the flex curtain grades are mostly around clarity and sometimes with the material sticking or streaking on the customers die. Problems with the cling also include clarity, but are mostly to do with what appears to be undispersed polymer gels that degrade on the customers machine and result in black spots on the cling wrap or a popped bubble.

Please excuse me for going on and on, but i hope to try and give you guys as much info to work with as possible. Also as previously stated i have read many posts regarding similiar problems and have tried to eliminate as many potential problems as possible before handing my work on to someone else to do......

i have tried these products on two of our lines which are:
1) Buss KD neader 1410, with segmented screws, take-off extruder into die-face with pellitizing head.
2) Buss Kneader 160mm solid screw, with right-angled take-off extruder into die face with pellitizing head. Take-off extruder bolts onto kneader to form compression zone>

The formulation for the cling is as follows:
Polymer (K71) Film grade 100phr
DOA 30phr
ESO 10phr
Stabiliser CaZn CZ116 2phr
Loxiol G10V 2phr
Stearic Acid 0,2phr
Lubex AF50 1phr

As for the cling material, I have :
1)Ensured the hi-speed mixer dump valve is not leaking dry resin into the hopper,
2)Tweaked the mixer sequence as recommended, ie polymer first to 65C, then plasticisor and stabilisor until dry point etc etc.
3)Increased the mixer dump tempereture to between 115 and 120C to try ensure volatiles are released.
4) Played with differnt temp settings on the compounder, as with feed vs screw ratios to try ensure better melt/fusion within the compounder, resulting in various melt plug lengths.

The material exiting the die face looks good, no discolouration(natural clear colour - slightly offwhite/yellow). We blow test samples in our lab and the "balloon" looks good, but on closer inspection has stretchmarks on the surface(for lack of a better description), also small polymer nibs are noticed. I think it is these nibs that are conglomerating in the customers machine and then being extruded out onto the film. Some stay a while longer and are then seen as black particles on the bubble. These look to be almost crystilline in appearance and are smooth and glossy.
Our sister company manufactures the same grade (formulation) with great success, but they do use a twin screw with a significantly higher LD ratio. So I ask the following questions:
1) Do you think the polymer gels are a result of the mixing process, or an insufficient state of fusion within the compounder, or a combination of both? If so, how do i determine this and what are possible solutions?
2) How can one determine if the state of fusion within the compounder is good enough?
3) How can one tweak the formulation to promote better fusion in the compounding stage and overall heat stabilty at the customers stage?
4) Am i correct is saying that one shouldnt use a formulation as a generic to cover all machine types, but basically adjust it to suit different machine types if not individual machines? If so what do you recommend one should bear in mind for the Busses?

As far as the flex for the curtains:

Formulation:
Polymer (K71) Film grade 100phr
Dop 40phr
ESO 5phr
Stabiliser - Reagens 398 2phr
Stearic Acid 0.4phr
Ultramarine Blue 0.012phr

The main concern here is clarity with sometimes a complaint that the material sticks on the die. Again it must be said that our sister company produces this material quite better than we can.( I might add at this point that we have tried to resolve this with our sister companies aid but as they have not really had these problems, they also are at a loss)
From the insights gained through this forum, I think our problem concerning the clarity is insufficient fusion in the Buss compounder? I have swopped out feed segments for additional mixing segments, resulting in the melt plug length increasing, and overall higher temperetures in the compounder and on the die face, but with the same poor clarity. Put too much heat and the pellets become a smear on the die-face....
External lubs might aid the sticking problem on the customers die, but this will again negatively impact on clarity?
How could i tweak or alter this formulation to better suit the Buss for fusion, whilst gaining clarity and improving the release on the die?

OY!! Looking at this, I realize I have asked for quite a lot of help, please believe me when I say it wasnt easy to come forth and stand in your shadows with the begging bowl in my hands.
Any and all advice or assistance would be greatly appreciatted.

Thanks and regards

Gavin
GavinS
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Formulation/Process problems with flex clears and cling

Postby Len on Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:06 pm

Gavin,
This is a formulation i found from Skip. It uses DOA as a plasticizer, but I think you're okay w/ DOP. As you can see the lubricants are quite different form your formulation.
Dryblend Mixed, Extruded at 350-380deg F (This is meat wrap----for produce, you can replace DOA with DIDP)

PVC K-65-67,Gel-Free! ---------------------------100
DOA (Adipate)------------------------------------30-35
ESO (Epoxidized Soybean Oil)-------------------10
GMO (Glycerol Mono Oleate)---------------------1.0
GMS (Glycerol Mono Stearate)-------------------0.2
Ca/Zn (Hi Zinc) stabilizer------------------------1.5
TNPP (Tris Nonyl Phenyl Phosphite) or
other FDA Phosphite--Weston 618?------------0.75
Blue Toner-----------------------------------------0.001 or as desired

I would also consider adding a bit of processing aid to address fusion, even though this is a flexble formulation the addition of K-120 ND has been known to help. Also, it may add melt strength to the film bubble. Lose the Stearic Acid, and try the GMS and GMO lubricants. I don't know Lubex AF50 is, so can't comment.

It was smart to check if raw PVC resin was leaking into your finished blend. This would certainly cause black specks in the bubble and could cause blow-outs!

Gotta run Brabender fusion test in progress,

Len
Len
 
Posts: 1017
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sandersville, GA

Re: Formulation/Process problems with flex clears and cling

Postby Louis on Tue Jul 03, 2012 4:06 pm

Some thoughts in no particular order

As you know, with PVC it is all Time/Temperature.

Has your customer ever run clear curtain material on their line? When I think black specks I think degradation, which is usually from dead spots in the tooling or overworking the material either by mechanical energy or resistance heating. Of course, if you work it too hard when compounding, they need to work it less as the heat history is cumulative.

When I here gels, I think higher molecular resin that did not absorb the plasticizers and fully break down in the compounding process. Gels will not hold up in an extruder and burn, rather they come through as a visual defect - sometimes described as looking like a comet with a tail, depending on the die configuration and the thickness of the extrudate, or even what looks like an unmelted pellet.

I am not 100% positive on this, but I would think that the formulation for a Banbury, a twin screw or a CM continuous mixer might vary as they all put different levels of mechanical energy into the compound – back to that time/temperature thing again.

Does your customer run the material from your other plant successfully?

Hope that helps
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.”

-Daniel Webster

My posts represent my opinion and not those of this site, its ownership, or the company where I am employed.
User avatar
Louis
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4093
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Allentown, PA USA

Re: Formulation/Process problems with flex clears and cling

Postby GavinS on Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:44 pm

Hi guys, thanks for the responses.
Sorry so long to reply, I actually have been out of town to visit our sister company to see if I could shed any light on my problems, unfortunately not much to report.

Thanks Len, I have seen that formulation before in of Skips posts that you have recommended, we do use Doa in the cling formulation. I have thought the stearic acid may be a possible problem, so i intend to try our formulation minus the St/acid, then again with the processing agent and lastly with your formulation (replicated as best possible with the components we have available). Hopefully something will prove successful.
Whats your take on using the same formulation broadly on different machines, is thier merit in adjusting them to suit the different compounding styles?
I think the St/acid in the curtain material could also be the fly in the ointment with regards to the clarity, what could i try that would assist in preventing the material from sticking to the customers die without affecting the clarity again?

Louis, the frustrating thing for me is our other plant runs both these grades succesfully(and further at the customers), with the same formulations, albeit on different machines.
The degradation occurs on the cling wrap grade. i will look closer at the mixer and the mixing process again to check for polymer that has not fully absorbed the plasticiser. What is the best practical test to check for these abnomolies? I wish we had a fully equipped lab, but unfortunately my resources are a little thin there.

Thanks again,

Gavin
GavinS
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Formulation/Process problems with flex clears and cling

Postby Len on Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:30 pm

Gavin,

You might try to run your clear PVC curtain compound at a lower temperature (lower heat profile) and slower through-put. The Brabender fusion looked pretty good, by the way.

Len :mrgreen:
Len
 
Posts: 1017
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sandersville, GA

Re: Formulation/Process problems with flex clears and cling

Postby behtar on Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:20 pm

Len wrote:Gavin,

You might try to run your clear PVC curtain compound at a lower temperature (lower heat profile) and slower through-put. The Brabender fusion looked pretty good, by the way.

Len :mrgreen:


Hi Len,

I am having kind of the same problem. What temperature do you recommend? Thanks a lot, Stefan.
Image
behtar
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:17 pm


Return to Compounding

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest