<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">

	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[plastics.com - Articles - ]]></title>
		<link>http://www.plastics.com/content</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Serving the needs of the professionals representing all segments of the global plastics industry, plastics.com is the world's largest online plastics community with over 70,000 members and features technical advice, blogs, calendars, resources, articles, news, forums and a marketplac]]></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.plastics.com/content]]></copyright>
		<generator>N/A</generator>
		<webMaster>staff@plastics.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:57:04 EST</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>20</ttl>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Single-source Documentation - Docbook Versus DITA]]></title>
			<link>http://www.plastics.com/content/articles/5888/1/Single-source-Documentation---Docbook-Versus-DITA/Page1.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When it comes to documentation projects, primarily technical, medical, and scientific, using XML is a no-brainer The heavy thinking comes when deciding which flavor of XML to use: DocBook or DITA (Darwin Information Typing Architecture)]]></description>
			<author>no@spam.com (Teresa Mulvihill)</author>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:55:44 EST]]></pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.plastics.com/content/articles/5888/1/Single-source-Documentation---Docbook-Versus-DITA/Page1.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>